Ebert note: Since we are
presenting what Terry Zwigoff describes as the “world premiere of the
Director’s
Cut,” my review of the R-rated version of the
film would not apply. “Mr
Beaks” (JeremySmith) of Ain’t It Cool News
saw a test screening of an early uncut version which
Zwigoff tells me “was about as close to
my version as any test audience got to see.” Here
is his review from Jan. 22, 2003.
BAD SANTA Test Screening
(d. Terry Zwigoff, w. John Requa & Glenn Ficarra)
It’s a snow globe scene yanked out of the booze-addled imagination
of Charles Bukowski; a department store Santa bent over in a back
alley by a dumpster, vomiting up an evening’s excessive liquor
intake. Thus begins BAD SANTA, a gleefully offensive Christmas
film teeming with contempt for the holiday’s crass commercialization
and humanity in general. Bumped all the way from December 2002
in favor of a fourth quarter 2003 release, this Dimension Films
production, produced by Joel & Ethan Coen, is as funny as any
movie I saw last year, and seems likely to raise more hackles than
that 80’s Yuletide
classic, SILENT NIGHT, DEADLY NIGHT.
In that film, Santa was "just" a serial
killer; here, however, he’s a drunken, chain-smoking, safe-cracking
sex maniac without an ounce of respect for himself or anyone else.
In other words, it’s a role Billy Bob Thornton was born to
play. And he is caustically brilliant as Willie T. Soke, a bottom-feeding
thief cum department store Santa who, with the aid of his helper
elf, Marcus (the very funny Tony Cox), knocks off a shopping mall
every Christmas Eve, living off of (i.e. squandering) his take
until the next year’s holiday season rolls around, at which
point the duo reassemble and case the joint from the inside for
a whole month as employees. |
The catch, of course, is that Willie has
to play Santa, a role for which he couldn’t be more ill-suited. Essentially, Willie
is a coarse variation on the department store St. Nick from A CHRISTMAS
STORY, the chief differences being his astonishingly profane vocabulary,
and his penchant for guzzling himself into a deep, drunken stupor
where he wets his "own" lap. This places a madly disproportionate
share of the burden on Marcus, an easily aggravated cuckold beholden
to his high-maintenance, status-hungry wife (Lauren Tom, in another
instance of perfect casting). And though Marcus does his best to
keep the constantly inebriated Willie on track, there’s no
quenching this misanthrope’s boundless thirst for booze and
tail, which leaves their scam forever teetering on the edge of
failure, especially when Willie’s untoward behavior including
quickies with fat women in the Big and Tall dressing rooms draws
the attention of the mall manager, (John Ritter), who eventually
enlists the assistance of his sleazy store detective (Bernie Mac)
to dig up dirt on the pair so he can fire them.
|
|
In the midst of all this ugliness,
we’re introduced
to a damaged, friendless ten-year old (Brett Kelly) who attaches
himself to Willie’s 100 Proof Santa. Initially annoyed with
the chubby, peculiar youth (basically a living, breathing version
of Ralph Wiggum from THE SIMPSONS), Willie suddenly finds the kid
useful when he drives him home to his large suburban house, where,
absent a mother and father (deceased and jailed respectively),
he lives under the “care” of
his senile, sandwich-making grandmother (Cloris Leachman). At first,
Willie is content to simply empty the father’s safe and
steal his car, but when he goes home one night to find his motel
room getting tossed by the authorities, he decides to move in for
the duration of his holiday stay, thus delighting the inquisitive
kid to no end, and providing Willie with a perfect safe haven out
of which to operate.
The set-up here should be fairly transparent at some point,
Willie is going to learn the true meaning of Christmas but
Terry Zwigoff, following up his impressive fictional film debut,
GHOST WORLD, pulls not a single punch. Working from a script by
the writing duo of John Requa and Glenn Ficarra (writers of the
innocuous CATS & DOGS), Zwigoff is on familiar turf skewering
our consumer-mad society, but this time he’s been handed
a far more damaging weapon. And, man, is BAD SANTA unremitting
in its savagery. Even when Willie finds his conscience, his way
of giving back to this trusting child is as wrong as every other
act he’s committed. That he feels good about
it isn’t at all heartwarming; he’s simply turning a
corner into another realm of amoral behavior. It’s this kind
of consistency in Willie’s character that renders the film
a tad repetitive down the stretch, but once the film clicks into
its final, uproarious act, this brief narrative lethargy is easily
forgiven.
Solid though Zwigoff and company are, this
is really Billy Bob’s
show, and his Willie is a perfect mix of misery and fecklessness.
It’s a combination we’ve not yet seen from Thornton.
I particularly love the way he’s able to subtly alternate
his gaze from simply blank and drunken to blank, drunken and dangerously
lascivious. Sometimes, before surrendering (far too freely, of
course) to his basest carnal desires, he doesn’t even bother
to feign interest, like when he’s being hit on by a cute,
perky, Santa-obsessed barmaid (Lauren Graham). Apparently, when
it falls right into his lap, he can’t
be bothered to switch on what limited charm he has (which consists
mostly of suffing a $5 winning scratch-off lottery ticket into
a stripper’s g-string).
I am hopeful that BAD SANTA’s move to 2003 is not indicative
of some internal vote of no confidence at Dimension. After all,
we’re
well aware of the Weinsteins’ predilection for shelving films
that aren’t absurdly easy to market (and, then, shelving
a select few that are). Yes, Terry Zwigoff’s film is going
to piss off a helluva lot of people, but there is an audience out
there primed for something this mean and tasteless. Just don’t
repeat MGM’s mistake
of dumping the Farrelly’s KINGPIN, only to watch it become
a valuable catalogue title that could’ve raked in a tidy
profit in the theaters had it been sold correctly, or, at least,
competently. BAD SANTA is "that" relentlessly funny, but with a
biting sense of satire that could garner a good deal of critical
praise, as well.
No matter its eventual fate, do yourself
a favor and keep this one fixed on your radar. As for me... between
this and CITY OF GOD, I can’t remember when my filmgoing
year has gotten off this promising a start.
--“Mr. Beaks,” reprinted from www.aint-it-cool-news.com/ |